Is it just me, or have we been bombarded by too many “awesome memoirs revealed to be fakes” stories lately?
The latest to come out of New York City revolves around the story behind Angel at the Fence, which was supposed to be the true story of how Herman Rosenblat, a Holocaust survivor met his wife while a teenager at Buchenwald because she smuggled him apples from the outside. They separated, and then years later, they reunited at Coney Island on a blind date. Rosenblat’s story was trumpted all over the place, and he even went on The Oprah Winfrey Show twice to talk about his romance, which Ms. Winfrey called “the greatest love story ever told in the 22 year history of the Oprah show!”
Except, according to the New York Times and recent research by Holocaust scholars, the most heartwarming detail about their “true story” is fake:
[Rosenblat’s agent Andrea Hurst said] “It is with heavy heart that I share what I learned today from my client, Herman Rosenblat, about his book, Angel at the Fence. Herman revealed to me that part of his memoir was not true. He’d invented the crux of this amazing love story—about the girl at the fence who threw him an apple—which drew my attention when I read it in a major magazine [Guideposts] two years ago.”
Of course, this means the book deal is off, but the more unbelievable part is that the deal for the movie (to be called Flower of the Fence) is still on, and set to begin production in March 2009 (according to the Times UK):
The film’s producer plans to go ahead. Harris Salomon, of Atlantic Overseas Pictures, said he had always planned a “loose and fictionalised adaptation.”
Also back in the Variety article, an unnamed Atlantic rep said that “Mr. Rosenblat had ‘agreed to donate all monies from the film to Holocaust survivor charities as a condition to moving forward.'”
Listen, I hope you can understand why Gordon said earlier this year that this kind of thing is not cool. Let the New Republic explain it a bit further:
Deborah Lipstadt, who wrote the 1993 book, Denying the Holocaust, is troubled by the possibility that Herman’s love story is fabricated, because she believes it could be co-opted by the Holocaust denial movement. “If you make up things about parts, you cast doubts on everything else,” Lipstadt told me. “When you think of the survivors who meticulously tell their story and are so desperate for people to believe, then if they’re making stories up about this, how do you know if Anne Frank is true? How do you know Elie Wiesel is true?”
I hope that Salomon or someone at Atlantic Overseas will be able to ignore their wounded pride enough to cancel this movie project as well.