Tag: Peter Bart

Trisha’s Quote of the Day: Conversations with dead people

I heard [deceased Warner Bros. Studio founder Jack Warner’s] voice when I saw Revolutionary Road this week. “Good movie and all that,” Jack was saying, “but why take these two great looking kids from Titanic and cast them as a miserable quarreling married couple in 1955? Why aren’t they remaking Tracy-Hepburn romantic comedies?”

“Stars are different now, Jack,” I tried to explain. “Guys like you can’t tell them what to do like in the old days.”

“Stars are their own masters, Jack,” I cautioned. “They want to stretch.”

“Stretch, kvetch,” Jack groaned. “I don’t want to see Angelina Jolie looking for lost children. She should be doing Bette Davis pictures. I want to see Sean Penn blow people away, not blow people.”
—Variety’s EIC Peter Bart, on how today’s actors would have fared stuck in the studio system of Hollywood’s Golden Age

[Note: I would totally go see Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet in an old fashioned Tracy-Hepburn-style romantic comedy or Cary Grant-esque screwball comedy.]

Trisha’s Quote of the Day: Give me my fluffy movies, dammit!

Gratitude should therefore be expressed to those brave filmmakers and theatrical producers who are bucking the trend. When it comes to mood-altering movies, Slumdog Millionaire takes the cake. It’s so uplifting, it’s downright narcotic. On Broadway, critics by and large are raving about Billy Elliot for similar reasons. Yeah, it’s a tear-jerker; sure, Elton John has written better scores. But the show is not just theater, it’s a tonic. Isn’t that really why people are willing to pay money for tickets?
—Variety’s EIC Peter Bart, on how today’s economy may affect tomorrow’s Oscars voters

Related Posts: Quote of the Day: Variety EIC Wonders if You Can Spare a Dime

Trisha’s Quote of the Day: Maybe he just needs to meet more yaoi fangirls

On the other hand, there are more scenes of male intimacy in Milk than in any other general audience film of its genre – more kissing and fondling and suggestions of further sex play. Again, all this defies the conventional wisdom that straight filmgoers – male and female – are uncomfortable viewing male-on-male intimacy.
—Variety’s Peter Bart, explaining why audiences might be turned away from Sean Penn’s Oscar-worthy performance in Gus Van Sant’s Milk

Marvel Comics movie news: ‘Yes’ to more Hulk, ‘No’ to Daniel Craig as Thor

Pictures of actors Edward Norton and Daniel Craig with icons showing their appearances in Marvel Cinematic Universe storiesTwo items about Marvel Comics movie futures hit the ‘net, spraying fanboy drool all over the place and breaking fangirl hearts.

Over at MTV, Shawn Adler spoke to Marvel Studios’ production president Kevin Feige who confirmed that they’re definitely moving ahead with another Incredible Hulk movie, saying, “We made 3 or maybe 4 million more [than Ang Lee’s version, which pulled in $132 million] domestically, and I think 10 or 12 million more internationally. That was one feather [in our cap] and a big deal! Now we have a Hulk that we can be proud of and that is a better match and fits more with the tone of what had been in our comics and what we want him to be in our films going forward.”

In fact, Feige is so certain about this prospect that he pooh-poohed Adler’s intimation that the Marvel Studios roster from now until 2011 didn’t have a Hulk 2 on it, and it’s this sentence that probably started the salivating.

[What] we are doing is suggesting and cross-pollinating the characters between films, and like reading a comic, I’d like to set that expectation that anything can happen—and anyone can pop up—in anybody else’s story.

Meanwhile, over at IESB comes news that no, Daniel Craig will not be playing Thor. He had been offered the part, but turned it down, and IESB adds that Craig jokingly said, “[It] would have been too much of a power trip, both Bond and Thor, and running around with long hair and a hammer.”

The part that slays me about this is that the folks at IESB asked Craig these questions during a press junket for Quantum of Solace. And the reason why this is funny to me is that this sort of dovetails into what Peter Bart wrote in a recent Variety blog post: You can’t ever really trust what a celebrity says during an interview to be indicative of their true feelings.

In my era, the time allotted for interviews was far greater. You often got to spend an entire day with an actor, or at least hang out for an entire evening. Naively, I felt like I’d gotten some insight into my subjects, whether they be Beatty, McQueen, Redford or even the deliciously mysterious Elizabeth Taylor.

Of course, I was wrong. The stars I dealt with on a business level bore no resemblance to those who presented themselves to a journalist. The “serene” stars often became money-grubbing nightmares. Those who came across as “tough interviews” turned out to be serious artists who were dedicated to their work.

Oh, Peter Bart. How is it that I can love and hate you at the same time?