Category: Around the Intertubes

So what’s Leonardo DiCaprio’s career up to these days?

leonardo-dicaprioEver since he got his first Oscar nomination for What’s Eating Gilbert Grape? way back in 1994, Leonardo DiCaprio has been trying to let the world know that he’s a serious actor, despite his teen-idol friendly looks. The industry has rewarded him several times with meaty roles in films like Martin Scorsese’s Gangs of New York, The Aviator and The Departed, Stephen Spielberg’s Catch Me If You Can, and Sam Mendes’ Revolutionary Road—for which he’s catching some Oscar buzz again.

That’s not all that Leonardo’s up to, though. MTV’s Splashpage blog caught up with DiCaprio in the U.K. and asked him questions about his production house Appian Way’s progress on two of the biggest geek horses in its stable, the Akira movie and the Ninja Scroll movie (as previously noted here at Geeking Out About).

“We’re waiting for the final draft of the script [for Akira],” DiCaprio told MTV. “I’m a big fan of Japanese anime — that and another project called Ninja Scroll we’re trying to get developed and made into a movie, and I know there a lot of loyal fans out there of the project and die-hard fans, so we’re going to try to do the best job we possibly can and we’re not going to make the movie until the script is in the right shape.”

Add that those two facts to the previously reported mention that DiCaprio is willing to give up his teen idol crown to Zac Efron, and I think you can see the questions that are starting to form in my mind.

Will the mainstream media stop referring to him as a teen idol or former teen idol? Can he successfully escape his image as the baby-faced boy from “Growing Pains” and Titanic, to finally get the part that wins him that Best Actor award? Does being able to choose (or get chosen for) good productions by great directors automatically mean you’ll be a great producer yourself?

This is a new corner for the actor’s life to turn, and I cannot wait to see the results.

Trisha’s Quote of the Day: Maybe he just needs to meet more yaoi fangirls

On the other hand, there are more scenes of male intimacy in Milk than in any other general audience film of its genre – more kissing and fondling and suggestions of further sex play. Again, all this defies the conventional wisdom that straight filmgoers – male and female – are uncomfortable viewing male-on-male intimacy.
—Variety’s Peter Bart, explaining why audiences might be turned away from Sean Penn’s Oscar-worthy performance in Gus Van Sant’s Milk

Brian K. Vaughn, others make HR’s ‘Next Gen’ list

thomas_dekker15 years ago, Hollywood Reporter put out an issue (what, you forgot it was a print publication?) dedicated to the “next generation” of Hollywood heavyweights, and they’ve been doing it ever since. This year, Brian K. Vaughn, writer of graphic novel series “Ex Machina” and “Y: The Last Man” joined 34 other people as being worthy of HR’s “Next Gen” status, and here are some others on the list:

Thomas Dekker, 20: Gained prominence as John Connor in the TV series “The Sarah Connor Chronicles” for Fox; now he’s got the lead in the upcoming remake of Fame and wrote and directed a drama about showbiz called Whore. Hmm… fame whore…

Hannah Minghella, 29: Daughter of Oscar-winning director Anthony Minghella, one of her next projects as Sony Animaton’s president of production is the upcoming adaptation of The Smurfs.

Jeremy Steckler, 34: He’s the guy who helped oversee Juno, and is currently working on Nia Vardalos’ My Life in Ruins as a senior vice president of production for Fox Searchlight.

Weinstein talks about his problem with Porno

At the premiere for Zack and Miri Make a Porno, executive producer Harvey Weinstein talked to Bill Higgins from Variety and had this to say about how difficult it’s been promoting the movie:

Aside from billboards and TV stations that won’t accept “porno” in ads, Weinstein said, “It’s a mountain to climb with female audiences. It’s a controversy we didn’t want. We wanted a mainstream Seth Rogan/Elizabeth Banks movie.”

To which I call bullshit, especially after reading director Kevin Smith’s quote from the after-party in the same article: “Harvey greenlit the movie on the title.”

Did it ever occur to anyone at the studio to think about the marketing problems and devise a way to work around them without compromising the identity of the film, like, the instant you signed the contract?

Also? Can you please stop talking about the “female audience” like we’re one big hive vagina who only likes sweet romantic comedies, Broadway musicals, and love stories? Alright, I do like those things, but I also like kick-ass fight scenes, watching buildings get blown up, sword fights. Oh, I could go on this topic for days

The sheer obliviousness of some Hollywood executives makes me wonder if we’re even living in the same society.

Marvel Comics movie news: ‘Yes’ to more Hulk, ‘No’ to Daniel Craig as Thor

Pictures of actors Edward Norton and Daniel Craig with icons showing their appearances in Marvel Cinematic Universe storiesTwo items about Marvel Comics movie futures hit the ‘net, spraying fanboy drool all over the place and breaking fangirl hearts.

Over at MTV, Shawn Adler spoke to Marvel Studios’ production president Kevin Feige who confirmed that they’re definitely moving ahead with another Incredible Hulk movie, saying, “We made 3 or maybe 4 million more [than Ang Lee’s version, which pulled in $132 million] domestically, and I think 10 or 12 million more internationally. That was one feather [in our cap] and a big deal! Now we have a Hulk that we can be proud of and that is a better match and fits more with the tone of what had been in our comics and what we want him to be in our films going forward.”

In fact, Feige is so certain about this prospect that he pooh-poohed Adler’s intimation that the Marvel Studios roster from now until 2011 didn’t have a Hulk 2 on it, and it’s this sentence that probably started the salivating.

[What] we are doing is suggesting and cross-pollinating the characters between films, and like reading a comic, I’d like to set that expectation that anything can happen—and anyone can pop up—in anybody else’s story.

Meanwhile, over at IESB comes news that no, Daniel Craig will not be playing Thor. He had been offered the part, but turned it down, and IESB adds that Craig jokingly said, “[It] would have been too much of a power trip, both Bond and Thor, and running around with long hair and a hammer.”

The part that slays me about this is that the folks at IESB asked Craig these questions during a press junket for Quantum of Solace. And the reason why this is funny to me is that this sort of dovetails into what Peter Bart wrote in a recent Variety blog post: You can’t ever really trust what a celebrity says during an interview to be indicative of their true feelings.

In my era, the time allotted for interviews was far greater. You often got to spend an entire day with an actor, or at least hang out for an entire evening. Naively, I felt like I’d gotten some insight into my subjects, whether they be Beatty, McQueen, Redford or even the deliciously mysterious Elizabeth Taylor.

Of course, I was wrong. The stars I dealt with on a business level bore no resemblance to those who presented themselves to a journalist. The “serene” stars often became money-grubbing nightmares. Those who came across as “tough interviews” turned out to be serious artists who were dedicated to their work.

Oh, Peter Bart. How is it that I can love and hate you at the same time?

Name That Film Shoot! (update)

NameThatFilm1Michael Pinto mostly blogs about anime and geek culture, but he keeps another, separate blog about being a vegetarian nerd in the hipster capital of NYC, Williamsburg in Brooklyn. A recent post of his has me very curious, since it looks like it’s for a major production because only for a major production would someone go to the trouble of exterior set decoration.

My Google-fu (and NYC’s very helpful “Please shoot your movie and spend money in our city!” site) has told me that it’s not the comedy called City Island, and that’s thanks to director Raymond De Filitta’s blog about that film’s production. I’ve bookmarked it to read and pour over later, mostly based on the fact that there’s tons of behind-the-scenes clips that he uploaded to YouTube.

It’s not Entre Nos either, and that’s based on the fact that the indie movie is set in Queens, and if Queens residents ever got wind of the fact that Brooklyn was going to be their stand-in, there’d be some trouble somewhere… It, too, has a blog that I’m probably going to check out.

The Exploding Girl doesn’t have a blog and doesn’t have a page on the IMDB, which makes me wonder if it’s either too small to be the movie in question or a pseudonym for some other bigger movie.

It’s not Revolutionary Road because that movie takes place in the suburbs of 1950s Connecticut. Reading about that film, btw, makes me curious enough to consider watching it because not only does it star Leonardo diCaprio as a father (yes, he’s old enough to do that now) his co-star is Kate Winslet, and it’s the first movie they’ve made together since Titanic. I’m not a huge Leo fan, but I have always respected his acting choices.

Which leaves us with The Tested, and I think this one might be the winner. The synopsis on the IMDB site is flimsy and kinda makes it sound like the other, larger production film that was filming in Brooklyn, but that will all change once more details appear.

Of course, there’s only one way to be sure of which film’s shooting and that’s for me to go to Williamsburg today to grill some crew members…

UPDATE: Possible false alarm, as NYC real estate blog Curbed thinks it’s for TV series “Life on Mars.” This post isn’t a complete wash, though, because now I have two new interesting production blogs to read! – TL