Tag: Web-original series

Trisha’s Take: “Star Trek Continues: Pilgrim of Eternity” review

Star Trek Continues Pilgrim of EternityStar Trek Continues – “Pilgrim of Eternity”

Directed by Vic Mignogna
Written by Steve Fratt and Jack Trevino
Story by Vic Mignogna and Jack Marshall
Starring Vic Mignogna, Todd Haberkorn, Larry Nemeck, Chris Doohan, Grant Imahara, and featuring Michael Forrest
Rating: This series is suitable for all-ages.

As a bit of a disclaimer, I was never really into the Star Trek franchise as a young geek. The Original Series was long gone before I was born, and since my parents aren’t into fiction that strays too far from reality, I didn’t watch “Star Trek: The Next Generation” with my parents, like many of my fellow geeks did with theirs. Therefore, when I heard that anime voice actor Vic Mignogna was involved with a project to continue the original serial, I didn’t think too much of the project at first.

At the same time, this is the same Vic Mignogna who produced his own fan-film for Fullmetal Alchemist titled “Fullmetal Fantasy” where he dreams that after receiving a replica State Alchemist pocket watch, he has transformed into main character Edward Elric and that everyday people around him have been transformed into characters from the series; this is definitely a form of meta-fan service as Mignogna is the English dub voice for Edward Elric. According to Mignogna, there were some legal issues regarding his showing it at anime conventions for a while; this ban seems to have been lifted since the short film has now shown up on Mignogna’s concert DVD.

I believe I saw “Fullmetal Fantasy” within the first year of its debut in either 2004 or 2005, and I remember being impressed with how professional it all looked, even to the point of one of the scenes taking place during a rainstorm, one of the most expensive effects to reproduce for filming. After doing some more research on the production staff of Star Trek Continues and learning that Steve Dengler, philanthro-geek extraordinaire was an executive producer, I knew I had to see at least one full episode.

The premise behind Star Trek Continues is that each season of The Original Series contained events which happened during one “year” of the Enterprise’s original five-year mission. Therefore, STC‘s adventures take place during the show’s (and the ship’s) fourth year of adventuring, which means that the crew of the Enterprise on STC is the exact same crew as was on the Original Series. This episode in particular calls back to Original Series episode “Who Mourns for Adonais” by not only bringing back the alien who claimed he was the Greek god Apollo but also Michael Forrest, the actor who originally portrayed the character as well.

In this episode, something has sucked all the power out of station batteries in a particular section of the galaxy and the Enterprise has been sent to investigate. They find a gigantic mass which starts rapidly sucking all the energy out of the Enterprise. Before the ship dies in the middle of space, the Enterprise is able to fire one photon torpedo at the mass, breaking it into pieces—but also causing a greatly aged Apollo and his sister Athena to appear on the bridge.

Apollo is able to eventually explain that his people were able to coalesce together again and had created the great mass in an attempt to recreate the kind of energy they needed to continue their existence, but the experiment backfired on them. Now Apollo is the only member of his race remaining and he requests that Captain Kirk (Mignogna) take him to a planet full of humanoids so that he can die in peace and not alone. Remembering how autocratic and how dangerous Apollo was during their first meeting and after the revelation that Apollo isn’t as powerless as he originally stated, it’s up to Kirk to decide Apollo’s fate.

I was immediately charmed by this episode due to my familiarity with not just Mignogna’s work but by seeing Grant Imahara (“Mythbusters”) as Lt. Sulu, Jamie Bamber (new “Battlestar Galactica”) as a redshirt, hearing the voice of Marina Sirtis as the voice of the computer (originally played by Majel Roddenberry), and knowing that Chris Doohan—the son of James Doohan—is playing Mr. Scott. As the episode played on, however, I found even more to delight me.

Re-casting Forrest as Apollo was a stroke of genius and added a sense of continuity to the new series. I was very much struck by the character and how much dignity Forrest brought to the role. There’s a scene where Apollo is being rejuvenated by entertaining a crowd of off-duty crew in a recreation room (the progenitor to Ten Forward, I assume) and beyond what was done in post-production, there’s an audible and visible change in his voice and posture from when you first see him as a frail, energy-depleted being.

Mignogna as Kirk was somewhat surprising to me as he was less bombastic than Shatner played him and definitely more reflective and passive as a commander. It’s almost as if the spirit of Jean-Luc Picard inhabited James T. Kirk’s body, and made him blonde. It’s definitely going to take me a few more episodes to see exactly how different Mignogna’s Kirk is to Shatner’s or even Chris Pine’s before I can definitively declare whether or not I like it. I will admit that the scene where ship’s counselor Dr. McKennah barges into Kirk’s quarters while he’s topless gave me a giggle, as did the denouement at the end where Kirk is quipping with Spock (Todd Haberkorn) and Bones (Larry Nemeck).

As far as the other roles go, Haberkorn seemed subdued as Spock, and both Doohan and Nemeck were wonderful in their roles as Mr. Scott and Dr. McCoy, respectively. I think I’d want to see more episodes before I decide whether or not I like Imahara as Sulu, Kim Stinger as Lt. Uhura and Wyatt Lenhart as Ensign Chekov.

The faults that I have with this production are that the audio mix seemed too soft most of the time and I kept losing Bones’ more soft-spoken dialogue. I also have a problem with the aforementioned scene in the recreation room; why did it take so long for the emotionless Mr. Spock to notice that Apollo was enthralling his human audience? And why didn’t he react when Apollo was threatening Kirk? The resolution to the central issue also feels like it borrows too much from Christian mythology as well as perhaps Monsters, Inc. as well.

Finally, there’s one more possible problem with Star Trek Continues: There is already another webseries which details the continuing adventures of the crew of the Enterprise called Star Trek: Phase II which started production in 2003. While I haven’t seen a full episode of that series yet, it also features cameo appearances by Original Series cast members reprising their roles such as George Takei, Walter Koenig, and Grace Lee Whitney. STC even boosted their Uhura from Phase II, as Stinger is credited as playing Uhura on the Phase II episodes as well. It sounds like there’s an interesting story behind this, and as someone who enjoys fan-media, I wonder exactly what’s going on as the websites for each production don’t acknowledge the other’s existence.

Still, I wish the cast and crew of STC much luck and hope that future episodes prove to be as fun as this one.


“Star Trek Continues” premiered at this year’s Phoenix Comic Con and this episode as well as three connecting scenes can be seen both online at the website and on its YouTube channel as well.

Trisha’s Video Series of the Day: Brotherhood 2.0

One of the things that is the source of the Internet’s greatest power is the rabbit hole effect, wherein when you’re looking at one thing, you click a link, see something else, maybe do a search, and then end up at a totally awesome thing that you’ve never seen before.

For me, the rabbit hole began while watching Part 6 in the “Let’s Play” of Cursed Crusade from Loading Ready Run and then heading over to the comments on the forum post, which lead to the “Crash Course” episode on The Crusades, and from there I started to wonder how and why John Green got to be so funny, which lead to finding out about the 2007 web project he conducted with his brother Hank called Brotherhood 2.0.

See, brothers John and Hank Green decided that they conversed entirely too much by text (emails, IMs, text messages, etc.) and for a whole year decided that they would only communicate in means which didn’t involve text and/or written words. This meant that for a year, one brother would upload a video to the shared YouTube channel vlogbrothers talking about his day and the next day, the other brother would reply. (There were also phone calls and possibly in-person meetings as well, but that’s not germane to the thesis of the project.) There were punishments involved for violating the rules/concepts for the project which would also be captured on video and uploaded to the channel. There are two playlists of videos on the channel for the initial project and several more concerning the side projects and what happened when the brothers decided to continue doing the vlog (Oh, God, I hate that word so much).

One of the reasons why I’m drawn to Brotherhood 2.0 is that it’s a glorious collaboration between two witty people, another is how quickly things scale all the way up to dangerously silly. So far, I’ve only seen 25 of the 200 videos from the first part of 2007, and my favorite moments so far include the improvised songs (because I do that to make my boyfriend laugh all the time) and seeing the brothers interact with the world around them in their intros. Also, the “In your pants” game is one that I’m definitely going to have to play with our current library.

I can’t recall when I started watching these, but I can definitely tell you that this is one series that I’m going to be watching for quite some time.

Trisha’s Video of the Day: “FCU: Fact Checkers Unit”

Never let it be said that 1990s heartthrob Luke Perry (Dylan from “90210”) doesn’t have a sense of humor about himself:

Luke Perry thinks his house is haunted in "Paranormal Factivity" (c) NBC/Universal

[Note: I had previously embedded the episode in question here, but thanks to NBC and its penchant for creating pop-ups when you embed their videos, I’ve decided against it. Please click the image above if you’d like to view the video on their own site.]

Based on an original short from 2008, “FCU: Fact Checkers Unit” stars Brian Sacca and Peter Karinen as fact-checkers for a fictional magazine. The series got a second life on the NBC Internet portal as an advertorial for the Samsung Galaxy S, but please… don’t let that put you off from enjoying it. What I like about FCU is that it seems to take itself seriously and not-seriously at the same time. I really appreciate how in the videos, it establishes the personalities of some of the magazine staff as well as lets the guest star shine in an extended bit.

The part about the Galaxy S being able to record a whole night’s worth of video and audio? That could probably be something for the gang at “Mythbusters” to investigate.

Trisha’s Video of the Day: “Guess What’s on the Curator’s Desk?”

Any guesses?

“Guess What’s on the Curator’s Desk?” comes to us courtesy of The Mütter Museum at The College of Physicians of Philadelphia, who would like to remind you that ever since humanity has sought to cure what ails it, the instruments we use to do so and the results of that science are truly, truly frightening.

Find out exactly what this and other fascinating finds from this museum are every Thursday.

Thanks to Tubefilter for this find!

Trisha’s Take: How Hollywood may still be “doing it wrong” in the world of web entertainment

When it comes to being a writer or actor, we currently live in interesting times—and by “interesting” I’m using the “Chinese curse” definition of the word.

Computers and the Internet have not only opened up a new distribution method for people to see their work and give them money for it, but also a way for people to view their work and keep from giving them money for it. The main point of contention during the Writers Guild Strike of 2007-2008 and the threatened Screen Actors Guild Strike of 2008 was over residuals from “new media,” and how much a production studio would pay them for re-broadcasts of the material over time beyond its initial broadcast.

To briefly summarize, rather than use the old mathematical formula created in the 1980s when home video became a concern or wait a few years to see exactly how profitable distribution on “new media” is and create a new formula, the WGA wanted the producers’ guild (the AMPTP) to create a new formula right now which would potentially address any and all concerns about how writers would get paid for work that has the potential to be seen and consumed in innumerable ways that aren’t easily tabulated thanks to things like click rates and online piracy.

Because that formula hasn’t been perfected yet and online piracy is still a problem, anyone who wants to start releasing their content on the ‘net is trying to figure out who their loyal paying audience (aka their True Fans) is and how to best get a hold of that person’s entertainment dollar.

About a month ago, Indie Wire.com blogger Cameron Carlson went to the “Producing Web Entertainment” seminar at the American Cinematheque in California, and came away with eight things he learned about how to best reach an Internet-based audience. However, the people on that panel and the series they were talking about were people I’d never heard of personally, which made me wonder: Exactly who are these guys and why would I want to believe their words on this topic?

After doing lots of clicking and a bit of research, I present to you my own list of five things I think these particular content creators are doing correctly and incorrectly when it comes to reaching out to a ‘net-savvy audience:

1. The folks at Babelgum.com allow for embedding, viewing fullscreen, and sharing via social networks on their video content hosting site and that’s great. However, they don’t have multiple options for embedding a la YouTube, and that’s bad. If I want to share your video with my friends on my blog, then I want to show you off in the best manner possible and a small inset ain’t gonna cut it. This kids’ re-enactment of the Bravo reality show “The Real Housewives of New Jersey” is pretty funny, but if the sample I’m showing you presents poorly, you’re not going to want to go to the source to see more, are you?

That’s a shame, as there’s some pretty good content over at Babelgum, including a BBC channel that has clips of shows like “The Young Ones” and “Red Dwarf” and many of the Improv Everywhere skits.

Overall grade: C+

2. I was fully prepared to give the gang at FearNet.com an awesome grade because they have an interesting selection of free R-rated movies that only require an age-checker to view, the female eye-candy host of their “Jobs of the Damned” original series seems pretty genre-savvy, and they already know their audience is going to be a bunch of horror buffs, so they don’t condescend when they conduct interviews, as seen above.

However, when I pasted the embed code for the video above into the text side of my WordPress Dashboard, a whole lot of clunky code came along with it, including a link to their ad network. Ugh.

Overall grade: B-

3. Sometimes, size really does matter and in this case, the lack of an adjustable embed code means that showing you this episode of “Easy to Assemble” is going to break some blogger templates and even some LiveJournal pages, so good luck sharing it with your friends. By far, this is the slickest of the productions we’ve seen in this review, but there’s just one major problem I have: Why does the About page only contain a press release for the second season?

Part of what turns a casual viewer into a True Fan these days is the level of access to the creators of that content and the amount of information those creators are willing to provide. If you’re not even willing to have a FAQ section available on your site to explain exactly why actual Hollywood stars like Illeana Douglas, Justine Bateman and Ed Begely, Jr. are schilling for IKEA in a quirky web series, then I’m not going to want to watch it, no matter how many Streamys it has won.

Overall grade: C

4. See what I mean about breaking templates? I really, really like “Imaginary Bitches,” even if I’m not their target demographic of women who do “lunch with the girls” and make plans to go shopping. The conceit of main character Eden (played by Eden Riegel, best-known as Bianca from “All My Children”) creating bitchy imaginary friends because her real-life friends are all in relationships and have abandoned her is so freaking interesting to me because it’s an unusual take on a very common situation.

The embed issue aside, the other problem I have with IB is the lack of consistency on the Cast page. Props go to male cast members Michael Traynor and Billy Aaron Brown for following Eden’s example and deciding to relish in the playful spirit of Internet TV and having such playful bios for their cast pages.

With the exception of Brooke Nevin, the rest of the female cast didn’t follow suit at all, which makes them all look like, well, bitches.

Overall grade: B-

5. And as long as I’m at it, I’m also gonna give some props to Strike TV, because just in the same way that Joss Whedon was bored, wanted something to do during the Writers’ Strike, and came up with “Dr. Horrible’s Sing Along Blog,” every single series in this long list was created because some writer had an idea, was able to go out and realize it, and someone gave it a home.

I am now about to take those props away because not only is the management team nothing but guys, but it doesn’t seem like any of the blogs or any of the other series have been updated since 2009. If a bunch of Canadians living on an island off the coast of Washington state can produce at least one video a week for over six years while trying to maintain a day job or school, you’d think a bunch of Hollywood screenwriters could do the same, yes?

Overall grade: F

Ultimately, as Carlson concluded, just as the plate engravers looked askance at Johannes Gutenberg or silent film stars cursed Al Jolson’s name under their breaths, the successes or failures of the Hollywood players in this article are probably being well-scrutinized by the bean counters at the AMPTP. I don’t agree, however, that it’s these particular creators who will be the “shovel sellers.”

In fact, I’m going to make a bold prediction right now and say that it’s going to be some unknown creator who’s going to come up with a product, video format, level of popularity and transparency, and price security that will propel Internet-original entertainment beyond the comparatively niche circle it currently enjoys.